Annual review: uniformity of wearable equipment to technical standards

At the end of 2013, if this time let us go back and count the digital equipment that we are impressed or loved during the year, I believe that there will be a lot of things at once: iPhone 5c/5s, HTC One Sony α7R, iPad mini ReTIna, Google glasses, etc., I believe that the number on the list will not be less than twenty. However, if after five or even ten years, let us recall what heavy products are in 2013, perhaps most people will have only one line on the list, which is: Google Glass.

Google Glass has implemented a new application for digital products. This application is close to science fiction movies, but it has actually appeared in front of us. As a result, despite months of Google Glass still not open to the masses of consumers, he has long been the darling of the media, geeks, developers and one of the hottest digital products.

Despite the novelty, Google Glass is not alone in this year. In 2013, there are a lot of digital products that are similar to it and attract us in the way of application. Pebble smart watches, Jawbone UP bracelets, Nike+ Fuelband, these are familiar things. They are also excited by people who are tired of computers, tablets, and mobile phones, and are also sought after by digital enthusiasts who are brave enough to try new things. Even if they don't look as cool as Google Glass, they have the same attributes and genes as Google Glass: wearables.

Wearable device development

What year is 2013? The answer can of course be varied. This year is the Chinese Lunar Year of the Snake; North Korea conducted its third nuclear test; Lady Gaga launched a new album two and a half years later; Snowden began the global escape after the Secret Prism program. These events have special meanings for different people, but they have nothing to do with our answers today, because at this moment we want to answer: This year is the first year of wearing equipment.

We define wearable devices like this

Glasses, watches, are nothing new, what makes them different after they become wearables? Or we can ask this question, why can we finally enter the door of the first year of wearing equipment in 2013?

If the wearable device is doing right this year when it is right, then we have reason to believe that this "right time" and the development of smart phones have a difficult relationship: on the one hand, from the system platform to the hardware, the terminal Vendors, after nearly two years of panning and shuffling, smartphones are in the most mature and stable development period; on the other hand, the competition in the arms race has finally begun to calm down, everyone wants to design When the function seeks a breakthrough, the fatigue of the smartphone is also beginning to emerge. In one aspect, the former has laid a solid foundation for the rise of wearable devices, which left a void for the rise of wearable devices.

The constant evolution of hardware and software has finally led to today's smartphones: a portable terminal that can integrate communication, social, camera, Internet, video, GPS, etc., as long as you want, smartphones can be used in various sensors. And with the support of other hardware, through the App to achieve new features and uses.

However, due to the limitations of usage habits and usage methods, although wearing equipment can accompany us for a longer period of time (you can wear them 24 hours a day, even if you wear them while sleeping), they are not destined to be a A versatile integrated terminal. That is to say, the wearable device ultimately needs a smart phone as its carrier, and the wearable device can only be an accessory that exists as an extension of the smart phone.

This congenital affiliation determines that wearable devices can sprout like a new star explosion only when the overall development of the smartphone is very mature and stable.

The fatigue of the development of smart phones is the void left by the rise of wearable devices, and we don't seem to have to explain too much. When the new generation of iPhone, GALAXY, Xperia, and Lumia can't bring us too many surprises in terms of hardware, design, or function, what can stop us from paying attention to those new wearable devices?

However, "the right time" is only an external cause. If the wearable device itself does not do the right thing, even if the time is ripe again, in 2013 we will be far from the word "wearing device first year".

So what is the right thing for the wearable device?

· The design of the right.

Design is becoming more and more important in digital products. Sometimes, although the function is similar, there is a line between the tall and the cottage. The separation of the line is the design. When people evaluate a thing in the past, they always say "useless", but for digital products, design can directly affect the user experience. We prefer to use the iPhone 5s fingerprint recognition instead of HTC One Max, because the iPhone 5s' fingerprint recognition sensor is more clever and easy to use. When I was too lazy to turn on the computer but wanted to watch the network video, HTC One Max became the first choice. The design of the large screen and the front two-channel stereo obviously can bring a better audio and video experience.

What's more, the design of the wearable device must follow the traditional dressing habits of the people, and you can make new design attempts, but it can not create new adaptation costs for the user. Google glasses, can be Google glasses, or glasses; Samsung GALAXY Gear, can be a smart watch, or a watch; Jawbone UP, can be a smart bracelet, or just a wristband to wear. If Google designed Google Glass as Sony's head-mounted display, it would either be a very failed wearable device, or it would not be a wearable device at all.

In short, the design of the pair is very important for the wearable device, convenient, compact, comfortable, etc. are the most basic qualities that a wearable device should have.

· The right function.

Using a product to do things that other products can't do is the key to the differentiation of digital products, and differentiation is an important weight for product success. This conclusion also applies to wearable devices. That is to say, the uniqueness of the function is the soul of the wearable device. If the wearable device can realize the function, the smart phone can already do well. Why do we need these as intelligence? What are the accessories that exist in the extension of the mobile phone?

We can't vacate our hands and take photos with our mobile phones to check and view the map, but Google Glass can, through voice commands, we don't have to use it to operate it, we don't have to look down to see what is displayed on the screen. We can't access new information and information when the phone is in the bag, but the smart watch can, just lift your wrist, you can get the latest news about weather, stocks, news, social networks. We can't tie the phone to our arm to monitor the quality of sleep after falling asleep at night, but the smart bracelet can be worn comfortably, with long battery life, no information nuisance in the middle, and no cell phone radiation.

Without these "right features", the wearable device will eventually be short-lived. Needless to say, wearing the device in the first year, it should have been like a MP3, MP4 and other tickets, and people have been forgotten in the corner of history.

5.2~7.5L Air Fryer

Large Air Fryer,Dash Air Fryer,7L Air Fryer,Digital Air Fryer

Ningbo Anbo United Electric Appliance Co.,ltd , https://www.airfryerfactory.com